Autonomous builds your engineers can actually trust.

Solenoid builds what your customers are asking for, then checks every build against what you agreed — cited — before it merges. You supervise the gate, not the archaeology.

▸ Read-only GitHub + Slack. Drift caught before it ships.

DEMO · AUTONOMOUS LOOP
Example data
What you agreed INTENT
#1 by revenue $224k ARR asking

Cut grading latency for large class sets

▸ Decision Anchor target: p95 < 60s for <50 essays — agreed in #product 2026-05-09. [Decision] · slack/#product · sam.r + vitor
▸ Constraint Mesa District ($140k ARR) in trial — explicit dealbreaker, evaluating <90s. [Constraint] · hubspot/deal-2811 + slack/#customer-voice
This is the source of truth. Every build is checked against it.
Solenoid builds & gates it SOLENOID
Picks the top-ranked thing — no human assigned.
▸ Cut grading latency for large class sets
Building autonomously
perf/eng-742-batch · agent
- grade(set) // one essay at a time
+ streamBatch(set) // parallel, bounded
+ target p95 < 90s
generating diff + tests…
No-drift gate · BLOCKED
Build targets p95 < 90s
You agreed p95 < 60s (#product, cited)
Drift caught — not merged. Rebuilding to spec.
No-drift gate · MATCHES INTENT
Rebuilt: p95 < 60s for <50 essays ✓
Mesa <90s constraint respected ✓
Checked against the cited decision + constraint.
Merged autonomously. You reviewed the gate, not the archaeology.
$ merged perf/eng-742-batch → main
+ perf(grading): stream batch · p95 < 60s · cited
solenoid · 14:23gate: passed
Solenoid picks the top-ranked customer ask — no human assigned. It builds the fix autonomously. The no-drift gate checks the build against what you agreed. Drift caught and corrected — before it ever merges. You reviewed the gate, not the archaeology. It ships.

THE NO-DRIFT GATE

Every autonomous build is checked against what you agreed.

The risk with AI codegen is drift — confident code that solves the wrong problem. So building isn't the last step; the gate is. Before anything merges, Solenoid checks the build against the cited decision and constraint that defined the work. Matches → it's cleared for your merge. Drifts → it's blocked and rebuilt.

Checked against cited intent

The decision and constraint that defined the work — each linked back to its source: the Slack thread, the deal, the ticket.

Drift is blocked, not shipped

A build that misses the agreed target never merges. The gate catches it and Solenoid rebuilds to spec.

You hold the merge

The gate hands you a cited verdict. The call to ship stays yours.

Autonomy you supervise — not a black box.

Solenoid does the labor and the build; your team holds the judgment and the merge. It reads every channel, writes the code, and gates it against what you agreed — then hands you a cited verdict to act on.

Solenoid does
The labor + the build

Reads every channel, ranks demand by revenue, writes the code, and gates each build against the cited decision and constraint.

+
Your team does
The judgment + the merge

Sets what "agreed" means, reviews the gated verdict, and owns the call to ship.

SEE IT ON A DEMO COMPANY

What customers want vs. what's built.

The demand map Solenoid builds from — ranked by revenue. Click any theme to see the customer asks behind it, and where the build has drifted from the demand. Example · Tessera AI, synthetic data.

  1. #1Slack thread summarization for the support inbox0.1919.6%
  2. #2Add Notion as a first-party connector0.1616.5%
  3. #3PDF export of the weekly customer-pulse digest0.1414.4%
  4. #4Inline AI assist in the docs editor0.1212.4%
  5. #5Multi-org admin console for the platform team0.110.3%
  6. #6Webhook signature rotation UI0.110.3%
  7. #7Audit log retention policy controls0.099.3%
  8. #8Real-time presence indicators in the editor0.077.2%

Slack thread summarization for the support inbox

HIGH DRIFT

$456K of ARR · last asked 2 days ago

What customers are saying

“Our support team re-reads 40-message threads every morning. A per-thread summary would save us an hour a day.”

via Slack · +3 more

What's being built

Nothing in flight. The customers are asking; the build is elsewhere.

See this for your roadmap →
Explore the full engineering demo →

RELIABILITY · SECURITY · TRUST

Built so a security-minded CTO can connect on day one.

A CTO won't hand a hosted SaaS strategic data — so we built so it doesn't have to: read-only scopes, your data processed transiently · never stored, every claim cited back to your sources, and your own LLM key (BYOK).

TRANSIENT · BYOK · NEVER STORED

Read-only · BYOK · processed transiently · never stored · every answer cited.

Regulated industry (healthcare · finance · government)? The Enterprise tier runs the data plane inside your own environment — the stronger never-sees posture, where your content never leaves your infrastructure (ADR 0070). On our roadmap for regulated buyers — talk to us.

PROOF

Solenoid built itself this way.

This isn't a someday demo. Solenoid's own product is built by the loop above — agents pick the top-ranked work, build it, and the gate checks each build before it merges. The build log is public.

Read the build log →

One roadmap item, fully evidenced. On your own stack.

Start with one roadmap item, evidenced with cited customer signal, in under two minutes. Read-only scopes — you see them before you authorize.

Recommended · richer signal

Connect — self-serve, read-only

OAuth with GitHub + Slack. Read-only scopes. Result in < 2 min, on Solenoid's managed key for the first run.

Start free →

Free run: one roadmap item fully evidenced, on a managed key. Past the cap, bring your own provider key (BYOK). No card, no auto-charge. You see the cap before you connect.